Daily Devotion | Leviticus 4:13–35 | 2026 January 20

Title: Daily Devotion

Scripture: Leviticus 4:13–35 (ESV)

Date: 2026 January 20

Speaker: Rev. John Chen

Transcribed, translated & edited by: Joseph Wang (Yufan)

Dear brothers and sisters, peace be with you. We thank God for His grace as He brings us into a new day to study our daily spiritual nourishment. The passage we are studying today is Leviticus chapter 4, verses 13 through 35. Let us pray.

We thank You, Lord, that You continue to show mercy to us. We ask that this morning You would grant us wisdom and understanding, so that we may comprehend the wonder of Your Word. In Your grace, please continue to strengthen us, that we may know and understand You. We pray in the name of Christ. Amen.

Today we continue to look at the sin offering. Comparatively speaking, we can clearly see that the sin offering is especially rich. Compared with the first three offerings, its description is much more detailed. It not only explains the manner of offering, but it also addresses different situations: what should be done if the whole congregation of Israel sins, what should be done if a leader sins, and what should be done if an ordinary individual among the people sins.

It also specifies that if the sin offering is brought from the flock, one must offer a female without blemish. These are very detailed regulations concerning the sin offering. That is, for personal sin, if one brings a sheep, it must be a female; if one brings a bull, it must be a bull without blemish; if the whole congregation sins, a bull is offered; and if a leader sins, a male goat is offered.

As for why these specific animals are prescribed—why it must be a male or a female, why a goat or a sheep—we do not have a clear explanation. Scripture itself does not explicitly tell us, and we also do not fully understand the reasons. Perhaps people in an agrarian and pastoral society would have been better able to infer the significance of these distinctions. But since we are not living in that kind of society, we are not entirely certain.

However, the main point here is not whether it is a male or female animal, or whether it is a sheep or a goat. I think the key point we need to focus on today is this: in order for sin to be cleansed, blood must be shed. This is the concept we especially need to address today.

For modern people, the ideas of atonement and bloodshed are extremely unfamiliar and distant. In our daily lives, we have no such concepts. Even in our education, the idea that atonement requires bloodshed is often presented as something superstitious, ancient, or even barbaric. This is likely one of the main reasons why we feel an inward resistance toward Leviticus.

When we talk about sacrifice, bloodshed, and killing animals, there is often a sense of discomfort within us. Especially in a modern context that emphasizes animal protection, we may ask: if animals should be protected, why should they be killed? As a result, reading Leviticus can feel very difficult for us, because there are many cultural barriers we must overcome.

The concept of atonement must be established. The concept of blood sacrifice must be established. And even the obstacle posed by modern animal-protection ideology must be addressed. This is why many modern people, including many Christians, feel that Leviticus and the Pentateuch are distant and unfamiliar. We do not like reading these passages, and when we do read them, we often skim through them quickly, thinking that the content is repetitive and confusing.

We may think, “In any case, Jesus Christ has accomplished everything. That is the core of the faith.” And while that statement is true, we must seriously reflect on why the sin offering exists at all, and why the concept of atonement is so important.

One way to understand this is that modern people are also deeply resistant to the idea that they themselves are sinful. In our time, people are inclined to affirm their own feelings as correct: “I am good. I am kind. The problem is usually with others.” If there is a problem, it simply needs improvement, not redemption. What is needed is not salvation, but self-betterment.

These modern assumptions are actually barriers to understanding the sin offering. In other words, Satan has given us many false ideas, and we have accepted them. In this age, hardly anyone is willing to admit that they are a sinner. Everyone believes that they are good, that through effort they can obtain what they want, that they simply need better education, better job opportunities, and more money. The concept of atonement is almost nonexistent.

This is why, when we read Leviticus, something inside us may react. But Scripture presents a completely different picture. The biblical picture is that all of us have sinned against God, and all of us are fallen in sin. Because of original sin and our own actual sins, we live in trespasses and iniquity. This is the biblical presupposition.

The well-known author C. S. Lewis once said that only when a person recognizes that they are a sinner, and only when they realize that they need redemption, does Christianity truly begin to speak. Theologically speaking, that statement may not be perfectly precise, but its general meaning is clear: if the concept of sin and the need for salvation are not established first, then the truths of Christianity are very difficult to communicate.

In the Old Testament, through the sacrificial system, God quickly placed His people in this position: you are a sinner, you need redemption, and this redemption is something you cannot accomplish yourself. Only Jesus Christ can accomplish it. Thus, you begin to reflect on salvation, and you begin to meditate deeply on the richness of the love of the Triune God.

If these presuppositions are absent, the idea of atonement leaves us living in a false sense of peace. We go on with our daily lives—working, eating, seeing news of sickness and death, hearing about famous people passing away—and these things feel like distant events, simply part of life’s routine. We continue moving steadily toward death without realizing it.

If we have not truly believed in Christ, then in many ways we are no different from the world. We live day by day, assuming that Jesus exists, that heaven awaits us, and that everything will be fine. We may imagine heaven as a peaceful place with no traffic or troubles, and we live in this illusion.

But this is not the picture Scripture gives us. Especially now, as we study the sin offering in Leviticus, we need to pause and ask: why must an animal die in our place? Why must we personally kill the animal? Why does every category—individuals, leaders, the whole congregation—require a sin offering? What is this system meant to communicate?

The sacrificial system brings us into a vivid, bloody scene so that we may feel the reality of biblical truth: we are all destined for destruction; we are immersed in sin; our end is death, condemnation, and judgment. This is a destiny from which we cannot escape on our own. Therefore, we need salvation.

Yet even this concept of salvation is resisted by modern people. Modern thinking emphasizes improvement, not rescue. People want their problems solved; they do not believe they need to be saved. This is precisely why the sin offering stands before us so starkly, calling us to reflect deeply and to enter into the biblical narrative.

Only then can we understand Christian truth: we are sinners; we need salvation; and the salvation we need is something we cannot accomplish ourselves. The blood of bulls and goats cannot remove sin. Only the precious blood of the Lord Jesus Christ can do so.

There is only one way of redemption: the Father sent the Lord Jesus Christ, who became flesh, came among us, bore our debt of sin, and had to be crucified on the cross in order to redeem us. God then raised Jesus from the dead and sent the Holy Spirit, who regenerates and renews us from within, granting us faith so that we may lay hold of Christ’s salvation.

Is that the end of the process of salvation? No, it is not. When we come to Christ by faith, that faith must be expressed in our lives. We must obey God’s statutes and ordinances, live out the likeness of Jesus Christ, and walk a lifelong path of sanctification until the day we see the Lord face to face.

This is a condensed description, but the process is clear: we are unable to save ourselves; we are completely fallen; salvation comes from Jesus Christ, from the work of the Triune God; we are justified; and on the foundation of justification, we live a life of sanctification until we meet the Lord. This is the full expression of salvation.

But everything in this journey has a starting point. That starting point is the acknowledgment that you are a sinner and that you need salvation. Only then can the rest of the journey begin. This is why C. S. Lewis said that Christianity begins to speak only when a person recognizes their sin and need for redemption.

Brothers and sisters, as we come before the sin offering today, beyond understanding the details we discussed yesterday, we need to establish a worldview, a view of life, and a system of values. Before the sin offering, we must ask: what is our true condition? Only then can we truly sense our need for salvation and develop a deep love for the Lord Jesus Christ, who was crucified for us and who is both our High Priest and our sacrifice.

This High Priest is beneficial for us, because He has ascended to heaven and intercedes for us. As the sacrifice, He is perfect, having offered Himself once for all as an eternal sin offering. Therefore, we no longer need to bring bulls and sheep for atonement. The concept of atonement is given to us by Scripture itself.

My purpose in saying all this is to remind us that when we stand before the sin offering, we must renew our foundational assumptions. We are sinners, and being a sinner does not mean merely acknowledging a label. When you admit that you are a sinner, you realize that what you need is not improvement, but salvation.

Some theologians have attempted to weaken the concepts of sin and redemption, presenting Christianity as a way to achieve a better, more fulfilling life. This may not be outright prosperity theology, but it still shifts the focus away from the core of the gospel. When Christianity is reduced to wisdom, emotional peace, or personal improvement, the cross is effectively removed.

The cross is offensive precisely because of its bloody, sacrificial nature. This is why people do not like reading the Old Testament. Yet it is precisely these difficult passages that reveal the truth: we are sinners, and we need a substitute to die in our place in order to be saved.

These foundational truths are essential for building a genuine faith, for cultivating a deep love for Jesus Christ, and for following Him faithfully. Do not try to smooth away the offensiveness of the cross. The cross stands as a declaration to humanity that we are sinners in need of salvation—a salvation that can only be accomplished by the Lord Jesus Christ on the cross.

This truth transforms our entire lives.

Finally, returning to the specific regulations: when the whole congregation of Israel sins, the elders offer the sin offering on behalf of the people. This shows that elders serve as representatives of the congregation. When a leader sins, he bears a distinct responsibility and must offer a male goat without blemish.

The method of offering is the same, but the sacrifice differs. This teaches us that those who represent the people and those who exercise authority bear a greater responsibility before God. For an ordinary person, the offering is a female goat or a female sheep without blemish.

This does not contradict the earlier instructions about offering a bull. Rather, Scripture allows flexibility: depending on one’s circumstances and the gravity of the sin, a person may offer a bull or a sheep. Although these animals cannot remove sin, the costly nature of the sacrifice teaches us that faith involves real cost.

Ultimately, the cost of sin is far beyond what we can pay. This realization deepens our longing for the redemption accomplished by Jesus Christ. When we recognize that no sacrifice we offer can earn God’s favor, we begin to cherish Christ’s salvation all the more.

This is not about creating an artificially dark backdrop. The reality is already dark: we have sinned, we are condemned, and nothing we can offer can remove our guilt. Only then do we begin to long for the true sacrifice.

This is why the New Testament writers—Paul, Peter, and others—express such profound gratitude for Christ’s atoning death and resurrection. They lived within the Old Testament narrative, which accurately describes the human condition. Only within that narrative does the gospel shine in its full glory.

This is why Paul, after encountering Christ on the road to Damascus, was completely transformed into a self-sacrificing missionary. His entire worldview was shaped by the Old Testament narrative, and this is crucial.

Brothers and sisters, what I have shared today is something you should listen to carefully. This Old Testament narrative forms the foundation of our thinking. Without it, reading the New Testament alone will leave you with only a shallow sense of salvation.

But when you return to these sacrificial regulations and realize that you cannot save yourself, your understanding of Christ’s redemption will deepen. Therefore, we thank the Lord for leading us to this passage on the sin offering.

Although the regulations may seem repetitive, they help us reflect deeply on the concept of atonement and its impact on our faith. This reflection is beneficial for building a firm and biblical faith.

That concludes today’s sharing. Thank you, everyone.

Translator’s Note (TN 1):
The pastor repeatedly emphasizes the concept that “atonement requires blood.” This is not presented as ritualism, but as a foundational biblical worldview. In Reformed theology, this reflects the seriousness of sin before a holy God and prepares the reader to understand substitutionary atonement fulfilled in Christ.
Translator’s Note (TN 2):
References to modern resistance toward Leviticus—such as discomfort with blood sacrifice or animal protection ideology—are cultural observations. The pastor is not criticizing compassion for animals, but highlighting how modern assumptions can obstruct biblical categories of sin, judgment, and redemption.
Translator’s Note (TN 3):
When the pastor contrasts “needing salvation” with “needing improvement,” he is addressing a central tension between biblical anthropology and modern self-affirming views of humanity. In Scripture, the problem is not lack of potential, but guilt and corruption before God.
Translator’s Note (TN 4):
The mention of C. S. Lewis serves as a literary and apologetic illustration rather than an authoritative theological source. The pastor himself notes that Lewis’s statement is not theologically exhaustive, but pastorally effective in expressing the necessity of recognizing one’s sinfulness.
Translator’s Note (TN 5):
The “bloody scene” imagery is intentional. In the Old Testament sacrificial system, God places His people into a vivid, physical confrontation with the cost of sin. This prepares the theological ground for understanding the cross as historically real, not merely symbolic.
Translator’s Note (TN 6):
When the pastor speaks of humanity’s destiny as “death, judgment, and condemnation,” he is summarizing biblical teaching rather than speculating. This reflects standard Reformed doctrines of original sin, total depravity, and divine judgment.
Translator’s Note (TN 7):
The discussion of salvation as a process—justification followed by lifelong sanctification—reflects classic Reformed soteriology. The pastor is careful to distinguish salvation by grace through faith from the necessary outworking of that faith in obedience.
Translator’s Note (TN 8):
The pastor’s critique of presenting Christianity as merely a path to a “better life” should not be confused with prosperity theology alone. His concern is that any framework which minimizes sin and the necessity of the cross fundamentally alters the gospel message.
Translator’s Note (TN 9):
The “offensiveness” of the cross refers to its theological scandal, not emotional discomfort. In Scripture, the cross confronts human pride by declaring that salvation cannot be achieved through moral effort or self-improvement.
Translator’s Note (TN 10):
When the pastor explains the different sacrifices required for elders, leaders, and ordinary individuals, he is highlighting differentiated responsibility within God’s covenant community. Greater representation and authority carry greater accountability before God.
Translator’s Note (TN 11):
The reference to Paul’s conversion on the road to Damascus underscores the importance of the Old Testament narrative framework. The pastor argues that Paul’s radical transformation is intelligible only within the sacrificial and redemptive storyline of Scripture.
Translator’s Note (TN 12):
The repeated call to “pause and reflect” is not a devotional technique but a pedagogical one. The pastor is intentionally slowing the pace to allow listeners to reorient their worldview around biblical categories of sin, redemption, and grace.

12 comments

  1. Oyekanmi Oreofe Oyekanmi Oreofe
    Thank God for today's sharing, it is indeed a blessing. Firstly, the sacrifice required by God is a perfect sacrifice without blemish. This is pointing to Jesus, our perfect and blemish sacrifice. Because there's no cleansing and forgiveness of sin without shedding of blood (Heb. 9:22). Secondly,… Read more

    Thank God for today's sharing, it is indeed a blessing.
    Firstly, the sacrifice required by God is a perfect sacrifice without blemish. This is pointing to Jesus, our perfect and blemish sacrifice. Because there's no cleansing and forgiveness of sin without shedding of blood (Heb. 9:22).
    Secondly, all categories of people including the priest are to atoned for their sins even though priests in the old testament are intermediary between God and men but because they are human, they are also subjected to weakness and, it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins (Heb. 10:4-5). So there's need for salvation since we cannot save ourselves.
    Thirdly, the first step in atonement according to Leviticus 4:13, is that there's an awareness of sin (when we know that we have sin and acknowledge ourselves as a sinner and see the need for redemption). It is the same for all categories of people, the sin must be "known and acknowledged". This will help us see the need for salvation and that's when genuine repentance takes place.
    Lastly, salvation is not the end of process but the beginning of our journey into God. Salvation is what gift us entrance into expression of our faith by living out the likeness of Jesus, obeying the statutes and ordinances of God, and walking a lifelong path of sanctification until the day we see the LORD face to face.

    Show less
    1. Jose Munyuru Jose Munyuru

      Thank you sister Oreofe

    2. That's very well said.

  2. LeviChen LeviChen

    我们要遵守律法,行出与蒙召的恩相称的义来,以此回应耶稣的代赎。
    真的得回到旧约的语境,知道我们是该死该灭亡的罪人,而只有耶稣能拯救我们,这才使我们对耶稣的牺牲有着更清楚的认识,以及感恩。

  3. 这些献祭的条例,绝不是平白无故地记载一些古老以色列人的宗教传统,也不是一本历史书,只让人产生文化上的敬意。如果只是这样理解,是非常肤浅的。这些祭物、这些步骤,其实都是清楚地指向耶稣基督的救赎。神不是随意地设立献祭制度,也不是随意地赦免人,而是借着赎罪祭,把人从堕落、失败和黑暗当中拯救出来。这样的拯救是真实的,也是真正付上代价的。 现代人——甚至包括很多基督徒——其实很容易忽略“罪的代价”这个事实。我们常常把基督教理解成一种充满爱与善意的价值观,觉得基督徒就是比较正直、比较有爱心、做事比较厚道,却不太愿意面对:神的拯救是以赎罪祭为代价的,而那真正的羔羊就是耶稣基督自己。 神不是简单地… Read more

    这些献祭的条例,绝不是平白无故地记载一些古老以色列人的宗教传统,也不是一本历史书,只让人产生文化上的敬意。如果只是这样理解,是非常肤浅的。这些祭物、这些步骤,其实都是清楚地指向耶稣基督的救赎。神不是随意地设立献祭制度,也不是随意地赦免人,而是借着赎罪祭,把人从堕落、失败和黑暗当中拯救出来。这样的拯救是真实的,也是真正付上代价的。

    现代人——甚至包括很多基督徒——其实很容易忽略“罪的代价”这个事实。我们常常把基督教理解成一种充满爱与善意的价值观,觉得基督徒就是比较正直、比较有爱心、做事比较厚道,却不太愿意面对:神的拯救是以赎罪祭为代价的,而那真正的羔羊就是耶稣基督自己。

    神不是简单地降低标准来接纳我们,也不是随意设立规则、又随意取消规则。相反,祂在自己的属性中显明公义与怜悯:罪必须被对付,代价必须被付上,而这代价最终落在基督身上。若忽略了这一点,我们对神的认识、对十字架的理解,都会变得很轻。

    所以,若我们真是属基督的,就必然会带来生命的更新。这并不是靠行为换取救恩,而是因为我们已经被救赎,就不再能轻看罪,也不再能轻看神的恩典。我们愿意跟随基督,努力在生活中遵行神的心意,在工作、家庭和人际关系中活出分别为圣的生命,正是因为我们知道:这救赎来之不易。

    赎罪祭不仅让我们认识罪,也把我们分别出来,成为属神的子民。这样的认识应当带来感恩,也带来真实的喜乐,更带来一种愿意顺服、愿意跟随的生命回应。

    Show less
  4. John Chen John Chen

    很棒!

  5. Jose Munyuru Jose Munyuru
    The Sin Offering: Confronting Our Need for Atonement 1. The Uncomfortable Reality of Blood Atonement Cultural Resistance to Sacrifice Modern sensibilities often view blood sacrifice as primitive, barbaric, or superstitious Contemporary animal protection ethics conflict with sacrificial pract… Read more

    The Sin Offering: Confronting Our Need for Atonement
    1. The Uncomfortable Reality of Blood Atonement
    Cultural Resistance to Sacrifice

    Modern sensibilities often view blood sacrifice as primitive, barbaric, or superstitious

    Contemporary animal protection ethics conflict with sacrificial practices

    This creates a significant barrier to understanding Leviticus

    The Modern Denial of Sin

    Current worldview emphasizes self-improvement over redemption

    People believe: "I'm fundamentally good, just need better circumstances"

    The concept of needing salvation rather than self-help is foreign

    C.S. Lewis' insight: Christianity only becomes relevant when we recognize our sinfulness

    2. The Biblical Presupposition: Universal Sinfulness
    Scripture's Unflinching Diagnosis

    All humanity has sinned against God (Romans 3:23)

    We are fallen creatures living in trespasses and iniquity

    Original sin and personal sin corrupt our entire being

    The Sacrificial System as Divine Object Lesson

    God placed Israel in a ritual that confronted their sin daily

    The constant killing of animals made sin tangible and costly

    This system prepared hearts to understand Christ's ultimate sacrifice

    3. Why Blood Must Be Shed
    The Seriousness of Sin

    Sin isn't merely bad behavior to improve

    It represents rebellion against a holy God with eternal consequences

    "The wages of sin is death" (Romans 6:23) - this is not metaphorical

    The Necessity of Substitution

    Someone must die in our place because we deserve death

    Animals served as temporary substitutes pointing to Christ

    This system taught: innocence must suffer for guilt

    4. From Shadow to Substance: Christ as the True Sin Offering
    The Insufficiency of Animal Sacrifices

    Bull and goat blood could never remove sin (Hebrews 10:4)

    These were pointers to something greater

    Christ's Perfect Sacrifice

    Jesus became the once-for-all sin offering

    His blood actually accomplishes what animal blood only symbolized

    He is both High Priest and Sacrifice - offering Himself for us

    5. Personal Application: Rediscovering Our Need
    Confronting Our Self-Sufficiency

    We must move from "I need improvement" to "I need salvation"

    Recognizing: I cannot save myself by any amount of good works

    This humbling realization is the starting point of true faith

    Developing Proper Gratitude

    Only when we understand the cost of our sin do we appreciate Christ's sacrifice

    The more we grasp our desperate condition, the more we cherish salvation

    This transforms Christianity from self-help to rescue mission

    6. Dangers of Diluting the Gospel
    Modern "Improved" Christianity

    Some present faith as merely wisdom for better living

    This removes the offense of the cross and blood atonement

    When sin is minimized, salvation becomes unnecessary

    The Offensive but Essential Cross

    The cross is offensive precisely because it declares: you are hopeless without it

    True Christianity maintains the bloody, sacrificial core

    We must not "smooth over" what makes people uncomfortable

    7. The Transformative Power of This Truth
    Paul's Example

    His Damascus Road conversion radically reoriented his Old Testament understanding

    From persecutor to apostle because he grasped what sacrifice truly meant

    His missionary zeal flowed from profound gratitude for undeserved salvation

    Our Response

    Let Leviticus' repetition drive home our inability to save ourselves

    Allow this understanding to deepen love for Christ

    Live with renewed commitment born from truly understanding what we've been saved from

    Show less
  6. Esther Zeleke Esther Zeleke

    Leviticus 4 shows that sin separates us from God and that we all need forgiveness. The sin offerings point to Jesus Christ, whose sacrifice alone brings true salvation.bless you all

Notice: Please sign in or create an account before leaving a comment.

Logged-in users can set a profile avatar and will be clearly identified.Guest comments will be marked as Guest.

Add a new comment

We'd really love to hear your honest thoughts, even if they're brief or unpolished. Putting them in your own words may help you reflect more genuinely on what you have learned. You're welcome to keep the reflections in your own words and there is no need to use AI to summarize.

0 / 25000